PLEASE NOTE: Although the review below was written after a viewing of the (excellent) 2015 Severin blu-ray of âVampyros Lesbosâ, the screenshots above are by necessity taken from the (perfectly serviceable) 2000 Second Sight DVD.
AKAs:
In addition to variations on its most common title (extended in the filmâs original West German release to âVampyros Lesbos: Die Erbin des Draculaâ), IMDB also currently lists the following, mostly without further details: âEl Signo del Vampireâ, âThe Heiress of Draculaâ, âThe Heritage of Draculaâ, âThe Sign of the Vampireâ, âThe Strange Adventure of Jonathan Harkerâ, âThe Vampire Womenâ, âCity of Vampiresâ. The substantially different (and substantially less good) Spanish version went by the name âLas Vampirasâ, and German language working titles are listed as âDas Mal des Vampirsâ, âIm Zeichen der Vampireâ and âSchlechte Zeiten fĂŒr Vampireâ.
------------
First of all, some background. I know I have claimed elsewhere that âKiss Me Monsterâ was the first Jess Franco film I watched, but actually, Iâm pretty sure âVampyros Lesbosâ beat it to the punch. In fact, I saw âVampyros..â well over ten years ago, long before the directorâs name meant anything to me. For a variety of reasons (in particular, the heavy cult rep garnered by the filmâs soundtrack in the late â90s and the mainstream-friendly packaging of Second Sightâs DVD release), âVampyros Lesbosâ was by far the most high profile Franco title available to UK viewers in the early â00s, reaching an audience that expanded beyond the learned euro-horror cognoscenti to eventually include even clueless young rubes such as myself, who happened to see its magnificent title (surely one of the best in exploitation movie history) on the shelves of a high street chain store, noted the heavily discounted price, and thought, âwell, *that* looks like a good eveningâs entertainmentâ.
Fateful words indeed. Predictably perhaps, my initial reaction to âVampyros Lesbosâ was pretty negative. Basically I think, I just wasnât ready for it. Largely unschooled in the ways of continental horror, I was probably expecting either a more traditional gothic horror movie or some sort of kitschy softcore sex flick, and needless to say, I got neither. With a field of reference that mainly consisted of British and American horror films, the idea of making vampire film full of bright sunshine, swimming pools and seaside hotel rooms just seemed absurd to me. Rather than recognising this as a conscious choice and an established part of Francoâs aesthetic, I assumed that the filmâs crew must have been busy sunning themselves down in the Med, and simply couldnât be bothered to inject any proper gothic atmosphere into their movie.
This impression was only exacerbated by the filmâs technical shortcomings (yes, the zooms), its repetitious use of seemingly random footage, and the almost total lack of a conventional storyline. An utterly disconnected plot strand in which Franco himself seems to be torturing women in a hotel basement like some kind of sordid gnome didnât exactly do much to win me over (I had âstandardsâ back in those days, yâsee), and by the time a confused looking Dennis Price turned up, muttering bewildering litanies of vampire lore whilst staring into the middle distance in some cheap looking guesthouse, the film just seemed pathetic to me â a shameless cash grab from some cynical hack, whose apparent determination to avoid censorship issues by teasing on explicit sexuality and graphic violence without actually delivering a satisfactory quantity of either proved the final nail in the coffin of my attention span. *Fuck this Franco guy*, I thought, not for the last time in my early days of horror movie fandom.
How things change. Watching the film today, itâs difficult to comprehend why my reaction was so negative, as âVampyros Lesbosâ now strikes me as a hugely enjoyable work, packed with stuff that, even in my youthful ignorance, I should surely have appreciated. The stark, stylized mise en scene and dissociative, almost psychedelic editing rhythms? The raging sitars of HĂŒbler and Schwab? The neo-gothic elegance of Countess Carodyâs costume and dĂ©cor and the deep, dark eyes of Soledad Miranda? Man, I shouldâve loved this shit! Why couldnât I see it? What was I thinking?
Whereas on first viewing I remember dismissing âVampyros Lesbosâ as a whole film cobbled together around Soledadâs iconic opening striptease act (that being the only bit that much impressed me), nowadays I think I actually find that scene to be one of the *least* interesting parts of the film â which is saying something, given that the sight of Ms Miranda prostrating herself beneath a mannequin in her full fetishistic finery whilst âVampire Sound Incorporatedâ go mental on the soundtrack must surely rank amongst the finer experiences life has to offer.
In fact, after revisiting the film, I think Iâm apt to echo the general consensus that âVampyros Lesbosâ is one of Francoâs all-time best, and certainly an essential cornerstone of the unique cinematic world he would go on to built for himself over the next fifteen years. Necronomicon and Venus In Furs may have seen him branching out beyond straight genre cinema toward the churning waters of psycho-sexual delirium, and the previous yearâs self-financed and barely released âNightmares Come At Nightâ may have seen him jumping in at the deep end for the very first time, but âVampyros..â is where it all comes together into a wholly successful, tonally consistent, 100% proof example of everything we now mean when we say âa Jess Franco filmâ.
(If nothing else, the opening strip-tease certainly provides the definitive example of such a scene â the benchmark against which the innumerable similar scenes Franco filmed over the years must be measured against and inevitably found wanting.) (1)
Fans often talk about Franco films âcasting a spellâ over them, but rarely is this feeling as palpable â or as literally applicable â as it is in âVampyros Lesbosâ. Working (as usual) from almost nothing vis-Ă -vis budget or production design, Franco drags us down with him into an unfamiliar milieu that soon becomes completely intoxicating, ditching almost entirely the concessions to cinematic convention that kept âVenus..â and âNecronomiconâ to some extent anchored in late â60s picture-house reality, and surrendering fully to the drifting currents of his own strange, sensualist vision.
As in several later films (including 1981âs partial remake Macumba Sexual), Franco here almost seems to be practicing a form of primitive, improvised magic through his camera lens. All it takes is a few disconnected âtriggerâ images, presumably shot on the fly as they wandered into the directorâs vision (a red kite flying through the Istanbul sky, a scorpion prowling the bottom of a swimming pool, a thin trickle of blood dripping down a glass windowpane, a fishing boat heading out to sea at sunset) and Ewa Strömbergâs Linda (our nominal protagonist / Jonathan Harker stand-in) is forcibly thrust beyond the threshold of her already somewhat hazy reality as the filmâs magic circle closes around her, and, by extension, around us.
The repetition of these images as signifiers of supernatural / psychic influence is reiterated to such an extent during the first half of âVampyros Lesbosâ that it starts to recall the âvisual spellsâ of Kenneth Angerâs magic(k)ally charged cinema. Whilst the notional âsymbolicâ meaning of each image is a little blunt in view of the filmâs storyline, Francoâs emphatic, montage-like repetition suggests that these images are intended to function less as ponderous thematic commentary, and more like subliminal flash-cards, marking a gateway from one realm of consciousness to another.
(In keeping with the filmâs obvious debt to âDraculaâ, it also occurs to me that these trigger images seem perhaps like some weird variation on the ritualistic pattern that signifies the journey toward the supernatural in so many more conventional vampire movies â the benighted inn, the coach-ride, the castle door etc.)
The idea of a powerful characterâs will roaming far and wide beyond her (or his?) body is a notion that obviously runs rampant through most of Francoâs filmography - indeed, the slightly goofy idea of the seducer repeatedly whispering her victimâs name across some psychic breeze (âLinnnnn-da..â) would surely be one of the first things a parodist would pick up on if making some hypothetical âCarry On Francoâ project. This rather nebulous concept is rarely expressed quite as convincingly as it is in âVampyros Lesbosâ though, as Jess allows the oneiric, melancholic headspace of Mirandaâs Countess to gradually consume the filmâs landscape completely, impacting the behaviour even of secondary characters (Andrea Montchal as Lindaâs hapless boyfriend, or Francoâs psycho-sadist hotel porter) to such an extent that the fact we too are under her spell must be obvious to even the most dim-witted of viewers by the halfway point, without the need of any explanatory babble about âpsychic powersâ or somesuch.
âI bewitched them; They lost their identity; I became themâ, the Countess says of her victims during her confessional monologue in the filmâs second half, which explains things succinctly enough, even as the fate she describes could easily be extended to the film itself, and its viewers.
Once youâve grasped it, I think that this idea of seeing the world through the lens of a âsupernaturalâ characterâs perspective is one that proves helpful in understanding whole swatches of Francoâs best cinema. From âNecronomiconâ onwards, when we watch one of the directorâs more personal sex-horror films (as opposed to his straight genre efforts), what we are often seeing is a vision of events as filtered through the subjective viewpoint of an altered or entirely non-human consciousness â a consciousness that, as Stephen Thrower notes in the essay that opens his new book, often mirrors the heightened sensation and temporal drag of sexual arousal. Such is certainly the case in âVampyros Lesbosâ, as the dreamlike pace of the Countessâs languorous, vampiric half-life gradually intoxicates every aspect of the filmâs style.
This sense of seeing the world through the distorting mirror of a sluggish yet sensually heightened being â whether a vampire, a witch, an avenging spirit, or whatever â is something that went on to inform most of Francoâs excursions into âotherâ consciousness, reaching its apex perhaps in the disturbing sci-fi abstractions of 1977âs alienating âShining Sexâ
The feeling that âVampyros Lesbosâ is drawing us into some kind of esoteric ritual â or at the very least, the deliberate conjuring of a very particular, pungent atmosphere â is only enhanced by the Countessâs curious use of untranslatable vampiric incantations (âkovec nie trekatschâ, anyone?) as she attempts to âturnâ her victims, and the rambling occult blather given voice by poor old Dennis Price as the ubiquitous Dr. Seward (a function he also fulfilled a few years in Francoâs two oddball Frankenstein films, of course)
Tying âVampyros..â in to some extent with these occasional comic book âmonster bashâ flicks (Dracula: Prisoner of Frankenstein and âThe Erotic Rites of Frankensteinâ foremost amongst them), Iâm not sure whether Jess just banged all this stuff out off the top of his head during shooting, or whether it improvised later by the dubbing crew, but either way, the lack of context and sheer strangeness of all this vampiric claptrap, together with Priceâs zonked out, affectless delivery, inadvertently works wonders vis-Ă -vis creating the suggestion of hidden depths of psychic / magical intrigue. (2)
To the uninitiated, Priceâs scenes will no doubt seem extraordinarily shoddy, but for those of who have already crossed the Franco threshold, their mystifying oddity proves quite charming â a familiar part of the directorâs world, and a wonderful example of bizarre logic and warped humour that runs through his work.
Curiously, âDr Sewardâ â the only character in âVampyros..â whose name is carried across from Bram Stoker - went on to become a bit of a recurring player in Francoâs own personal mythology; having already cast Paul Muller in the role in his adaptation of âCount Draculaâ a year earlier, Franco seems to have developed a bit of a fascination for the character.
Whilst the good doctorâs appearance in the form of Alberto Dalbes in the marginally Stoker-derived âDracula: P of Fâ and its sort-of sequel âErotic Rites..â seems understandable enough, he continued to lurk in the corners of the Francoverse long after vampiric subject matter had departed, his appearances usually coinciding with the directorâs weird fixation with dubious mental institutions in which tormented, writhing women display a psychic connection to whatever unpleasantness is transpiring in the respective filmâs main plot â an idea that we might suppose to be loosely inspired by the behavior of Sewardâs patient Renfield in some iterations of Stokerâs âDraculaâ. (3)
Quite what these scenes brought to the films, or why Franco so obsessively reiterated them, remains a mystery, but for what itâs worth, the Dr Seward of âVampyros Lesbosâ seems to provide the model for all the dubious seekers into the mystery that followed, just as the film as a whole provides a handy index of so many of the other themes and techniques that Franco would continually revisit through the â70s and â80s.
As has often been remarked, Soledad Mirandaâs performance in âVampyros Lesbosâ is magnificent. Exuding a kind of primal charisma and commitment to her role that more than matches her legendary beauty, she is utterly convincing as the predatory Countess Carody, her mesmerizing, inky black gaze conveying depth of experience that could well hold centuries of undead torment. Comparable to Barbara Steeleâs equally iconic turn in âBlack Sundayâ, her very presence on screen is enough to leave horror fans speechless.
What particularly got under my skin upon revisiting the film is the Countessâs confessional monologue to her servant (named Morpho of course, and played here by JosĂ© MartĂnez Blanco). Staring upward from a kind of futon in a red-hued, curtained room as the camera roams around her, she describes her initial encounter with Count Dracula (âWas it a hundred years ago, or maybe two hundred? I was young and all alone..â) amid an outbreak of violent looting that saw her family home sacked by soldiers in some unspecified war, and her brutal initiation into the ways of vampirism, as the Count âsavedâ her from gang rape before taking the place of her attackers himself.
Franco films are rarely celebrated for their dialogue, but this soliloquy is both evocative and tragic, allowing Mirandaâs character to attain a depth that is rarely given voice in Francoâs narratives. In fact, it manages to cut right to the heart of the kind of vampiric angst that writers like Anne Rice would make a career out of without sinking to the level of whinging self-pity, and in giving real form to the tragedy underlying all of Francoâs supernatural female predators, it in particular casts a whole new light on Mirandaâs fellow Countess in 'Vampyros Lesbosâs semi-sequel âLa Comtesse Noireâ / âFemale Vampireâ (1973). (4)
As the Countess describes her domination by Dracula and the way he âturnedâ her following her ordeal, the implications of childhood abuse and the cycle of dysfunction it can inspire in adulthood are hard to miss, even buried under layers of pulp gothic cushioning. Even whilst the waters are muddied somewhat by a rather unnecessary â..and thatâs why I hate all menâ comic book lesbian twist, this is neither the first nor last time the shadow of such issues can be found lurking in Francoâs better films, ensuring that, beyond all the sexadelic tomfoolery, there is a crushing sense of sadness and emptiness at the filmâs core.
In fact, a big part of the filmâs atmosphere â injected subtly, and easy to miss at first â is its overwhelming feeling of melancholy. Whilst part and parcel of any vampire story that invites sympathy toward its monster, this is an element that would grow increasingly prominent in Francoâs sexual domination narratives as the years went on, reaching a crescendo of gut-wrenching despair in films like Lorna the Exorcist and Doriana Gray. At this stage though, that darkness simply shimmers on the horizon - a delicious, bitter undercurrent beneath the filmâs luscious, multi-hued surface.
Given what an excellent vehicle Dracula-derived storylines provided for Francoâs exploration of sexual domination and mind control, itâs surprising how few vampire films he actually made. Not counting his â90s/â00s shot-on-video projects, I count only five films centering on vampirism in his core filmography, and of those, two (the aforementioned âDracula: Prisoner of Frankensteinâ and 1970âs âCount Draculaâ) feature more traditional villainous male Counts and largely eschew the storyâs sexual angle, leaving only a central trilogy of erotically charged vampire movies, within which âVampyros Lesbosâ stands preeminent alongside âFemale Vampireâ and the somewhat lesser known âDaughter of Draculaâ (1972). (5)
As per the inexplicable proliferation of Dr. Sewards, this relative neglect of vampiric subject matter in the Franco canon remains a mystery, as all three of the above mentioned films reveal Jess to be a perfect chronicler of such tales, whose unknowable, ennui-ridden sexual predators not only provided him with endless opportunities to ruminate upon his preferred themes and scenarios, but also a solid base of box office appeal.
Maybe, as with so many other things, he just got bored. Whilst his far more numerous DeSadean stories and crime/mystery focused sex dramas usually found ways to try to put a new spin on the material, perhaps he realised, with particular reference to his oft-expressed distaste for the crusty old gothic horrors many of his contemporaries were still knocking out, that there was only so much he could do with a menu of fangs, blood and candelabras, and quit whilst he was ahead.
When taking about this kind of euro-horror movie, myself and other writers are constantly abusing the term âdream-likeâ, whether in reference to filmmakers who deliberately seek such an effect, or those who merely stumble upon it, but it is rare that either Franco or any of his contemporaries achieved a mood that was so literally dream-like as that of âVampyros Lesbosâ.
It is the kind of film from which, if you lower your guard and let it wash over you, you will emerge ninety minutes later as if waking from a coma. Its cracked logic and intriguing non-sequiturs, its blurred contours, hypnotic repetitions, random drifts of intangible emotion and the strange hints of unseen significance lurking beneath its tides of light and shadow⊠âVampyros Lesbosâ is an exploitation movie as dream machine that richly deserves its reputation as one of Francoâs finest works, and as one of the cornerstones of â70s euro-horror in general. It is recommended without reservation, and if you donât like it, well, I dunno⊠try coming back in ten years.
------------------------
Kink: 4/5
Creepitude: 4/5
Pulp Thrills: 3/5
Altered States: 5/5
Sight Seeing: 4/5
-------------------------
(1)I sort of like the idea that the reclusive Countess Carody emerges from her sun-blessed island lair to perform exotic strip routines in seedy bars. Her pastime is never mentioned by the characters outside of these sequences, perhaps implying that Linda â watching with vacant, glazed eyes is simply hallucinating the whole thing â a vivid premonition of the sexual obsession she will soon be initiated into by the Countess - whilst her boyfriend, adopting a leering smirk, is enjoying an altogether more conventional sleazy floor-show (until later in the film of course, when it is his turn to be similarly be-witched).
(2)Iâll try to refrain from saying anything unkind with regard to Dennis Priceâs widely documented alcoholism, but letâs just say that if you were to tell me heâd been submerged in a barrel of brandy for several hours prior to each of his appearances in Franco films, Iâd certainly believe you. Heâs still a trooper though, delivering his absurd dialogue with admirable decorum, and, given that he appeared in a number of films for Franco over several years, spanning both the reasonably budgeted Harry Alan Towers productions and some ultra-cheap quickies that presumably only offered the very slimmest of pay cheques, we can at least hope he was a good sport and enjoyed the experience, rather than considering such work a stain upon his rapidly diminishing dignity, or somesuch.
(3)For examples of this, see for instance âLorna the Exorcistâ, where the doctorâs questionable establishment features gaudy wallpaper and plush interiors extremely similar to Priceâs rather squalid HQ in âVampyros..â, and the utterly surreal âShining Sexâ, wherein Francoâs wheelchair-bound doctor seems to be running his experimental psychiatric research unit from the upper floors of an Alicante resort hotel!
(4)Watching the two films in close succession, itâs difficult not to get the impression that Mirandaâs Countess Nadine and Lina Romayâs Countess Irina are in some way sisters, cousins, or in some way different manifestations of the same character, both wrestling with the same back story, the same compulsions and inner loneliness. Itâs a shame they never got together for the ultimate Jess Franco slash fiction team-up, but maybe itâs for the best⊠poor Jess might have suffered a heart attack right there behind the viewfinder.
(5)I know, I know â only when referring to Jess Franco could you claim that a director had limited interest in a subject on the basis that he only made five films about it! But nonetheless, itâs interesting to reflect that, despite often being pigeonholed for years as âone of those lesbian vampire guysâ, Franco actually probably made more movies about people getting lost in the jungle than he did about vampires.